An analytical report was published by the American newspaper “Eurasia Review”. It highlighted the tragic death of Presidential Chief of Staff Mohammed Al-Haddad. The causes of his death remain unknown.
The report affirmed this. Al-Haddad was widely regarded as a prominent military figure in post-2011 Libya. He emerged from a generation of officers. Their characters were shaped by state collapse. They faced a long struggle to rebuild state institutions. This occurred amidst conflict and fragmentation.
According to the report, Al-Haddad steadily rose through military ranks. He earned a reputation as a pragmatic officer. He had close ties with armed forces in western Libya. His appointment during the 2019-2020 war was crucial. It came amid renewed international momentum for stability. This stability was sought through political dialogue and security arrangements.
The report states Al-Haddad oversaw military structures. These were allied with authorities in western Libya. He simultaneously engaged in dialogue with rival eastern forces. This included his membership in the Joint Military Committee of 10. This was one of his most prominent roles.
Al-Haddad played a pivotal role in negotiating ceasefire agreements. He also participated in confidence-building measures. Discussions on the withdrawal of foreign forces and mercenaries were also part of his work. He was effective in coordinating military operations. He also improved command and control structures.
The report added that Al-Haddad facilitated cooperation. This was among various armed groups defending Tripoli. This occurred during 2019 and 2020. His leadership during the conflict earned him significant political and military weight in western Libya. Simultaneously, he became a controversial figure among rival factions.
The report indicated Al-Haddad advocated for a unified national army. This professional army would operate under civilian authority. He consistently stressed ending parallel military command structures. He also emphasized integrating armed formations into state institutions. The army needed to be isolated from direct political competition.
The report stated Al-Haddad’s ambitions faced continuous obstacles. These arose from Libya’s fragmented governance. External interventions also posed challenges. Competing regional alliances further complicated matters.
The report mentioned two scenarios for his plane crash. The first is a technical malfunction. This prevented the crew from successfully completing an emergency landing. The second scenario suggests an assassination attempt. Sabotage or terrorist activity is also possible. This is considered given Libya’s complex regional and international environment.
The report warned of potential internal power struggles. These could erupt over key military positions following Al-Haddad’s death. Libya’s future path remains highly uncertain. Deep internal divisions exist among rival factions. Competing foreign alliances also contribute to the uncertainty. This occurs despite ongoing UN efforts to unify the military. The UN also aims to conduct elections.
The report concluded by noting the investigation’s findings. How these findings are received and acted upon is crucial. They could significantly impact power dynamics. Military cohesion would also be affected. Ongoing UN-led efforts aim for political stability. They also seek comprehensive national reconciliation.