Osama Al-Shuhoumi is the founder of the Hesperides Center for Security and Strategic Studies in London. He believes some voices sympathize with Iranian rhetoric. Al-Sadiq Al-Gharyani is a prominent figure among them. This rhetoric especially concerns targeting Gulf states. It could provoke political sensitivity from the United States and its allies. Al-Shuhoumi stressed a crucial distinction. Political stances differ from legal criteria. Washington uses these criteria to impose sanctions or classifications.
Al-Shuhoumi spoke to Al-Nahar newspaper. Al-Marsad newspaper also followed his statements. He confirmed that the United States does not usually rely solely on statements. Political positions alone are insufficient. Instead, it requires evidence. This evidence relates to financial or logistical support. It can also involve operational coordination with designated groups. He clarified his point. Mere sympathy or rhetorical alignment is not legally sufficient. It cannot lead to imposing sanctions. It also cannot classify any religious or political movement.
Al-Shuhoumi added another point. Such rhetoric could increase US scrutiny. This applies to both intelligence and financial levels. Tension is escalating between Iran and Washington’s Gulf allies. This makes increased scrutiny even more likely. He noted past experiences. US action is often gradual. It typically begins with monitoring. Political pressure follows. Sanctions or classifications are only imposed later. This occurs if clear evidence emerges. Evidence must show direct support for armed activities.
Al-Shuhoumi warned against direct comparisons. He referred to the situation in Sudan. Such comparisons must be made cautiously. The US decision in Sudan was based on accusations. These accusations involved links to armed networks. It was not based solely on political stances. He affirmed his point. This type of rhetoric may increase international monitoring. However, it will not lead to punitive measures. Concrete evidence must be available for such actions.